SEO Companies Reviewed

Editorial Contributors

Write for SEO Companies Reviewed.

We publish vendor-agnostic writing on the SEO agency market — selection frameworks, pricing teardowns, engagement case studies, industry analysis. SEO Companies Reviewed is an independent directory and editorial voice, not an agency and not a vendor blog. Our readers are in-house marketing leads actively evaluating who to hire, which means the writing that lands here is candid, specific, and allergic to sales pitch. If you want to place a promotional piece about your firm, this isn't the spot.

Who we publish

Our contributor bench is built around independence and candour. We prioritise writers who bring real context from the buyer side or the operator side of the market — not agency owners pitching their own firms.

In-house marketing leads

Heads of marketing, growth, and content who've hired SEO agencies and can speak plainly about what worked, what didn't, and what they'd do differently.

Former agency leaders

Ex-account directors, SEO directors, and heads of strategy willing to write candidly about pricing, retainer dynamics, and how engagements actually get scoped behind the scenes.

Industry analysts

Researchers and consultants covering the SEO services market — consolidation, pricing trends, AI disruption of the agency model, emerging service categories.

B2B marketing consultants

Independent operators who regularly run agency-selection searches for clients and can share evaluation frameworks, RFP templates, and red-flag patterns.

Topics we publish

If you're searching “write for us SEO” or looking for a guest post SEO industry outlet, our editorial scope is narrower than most blogs — because our readers are narrower. They're already past “what is SEO” and deep into “which agency do I hire, at what price, with what scope.” Angles we're consistently commissioning:

  • How to evaluate and vet an SEO agency — frameworks, red flags, RFP structures, reference-check questions
  • Case studies of successful or failed agency engagements — anonymised client names are fine, but the specifics must be real
  • SEO pricing models, retainer structures, and scope-of-work patterns across agency tiers
  • State of the SEO industry — consolidation, AI disruption of agency economics, pricing trend analysis
  • Deep dives on specific service categories — local, enterprise, e-commerce, international, technical SEO

Editorial bar — no pay-to-play

Submissions typically run 1,500 to 3,500 words. Every piece needs named data, screenshots, or a disclosed methodology — we do not publish hand-wave-y thought-leadership without specifics.

  • We do not publish agency-promotion pieces disguised as editorial. If the draft is really a case study about your own firm, pitch it to your own blog.
  • We do not accept payment for placement, and we do not offer preferential directory coverage to advertisers, sponsors, or contributors. The wall between editorial and commercial is the entire product.
  • Anonymise client names when you need to — budget figures, campaign details, and account dynamics matter more than the logo. But the specifics have to be real. Composite case studies get rejected.
  • Original to us. Not cross-posted on your own site, LinkedIn, Medium, or another publication — before or after we run it.

What contributors get

We're not going to pretend contributing SEO agency writing here is a growth hack. It's an editorial partnership. Here's what that actually looks like:

  • Byline plus a 200-word bio with up to two links — your site and your LinkedIn, or equivalent.
  • A senior editor works with you through two drafts. Real structural feedback, not a copy-edit pass.
  • Publication on a site read by in-house marketing leads who are actively shopping for SEO help — not a top-of-funnel audience cycling through tips posts.
  • Honest reader positioning. Our audience is evaluating agencies, so writing here plants your name in front of exactly the people who eventually make hiring decisions.
  • A voice of authority on agency-selection topics without the conflict-of-interest of publishing on an agency's own blog. Independence is the asset.

How to pitch

Send the pitch first — not a finished draft. We want to shape the angle with you before you invest hours writing something that turns out to overlap with work already commissioned.

  1. Three to five sentences on the angle. What is the insight. What will the reader walk away able to do differently.
  2. Your role and context — in-house marketer, ex-agency, analyst, consultant — plus one previous piece of work we can read to calibrate voice and depth.
  3. Expect a response within five to seven business days. If you haven’t heard back by then, a one-line follow-up through the same form is welcome.
  4. Please do not send a speculative full draft. We reject roughly 90% of unsolicited finished drafts on angle alone — you’ll save us both time.